DOI: https://doi.org/10.7341/20221812 JEL codes: M10, M16, M19 /

Received 15 May 2021; Revised 12 September 2021; Accepted 4 October 2021.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode).

Ha Thi Hai Do, Associate Prof. Dr, Faculty of Management Science, National Economics University, 207 Giai Phong Road, Hai Ba Trung District, Hanoi – 10000, Vietnam, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Yen Thi Hai Mac, M.A, Faculty of Management Science, National Economics University, 207 Giai Phong Road, Hai Ba Trung District, Hanoi – 10000, Vietnam, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Hoa Thi Van Tran, Prof. Dr, National Economics University, 207 Giai Phong Road, Hai Ba Trung District, Hanoi – 10000, Vietnam, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Thuy Thi Le Nguyen, Ph.D, Faculty of Management Science, National Economics University, 207 Giai Phong Road, Hai Ba Trung District, Hanoi – 10000, Vietnam, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tax compliance is a topic of concern for many scholars all over the world. Most of them point out factors affecting tax compliance, and one significant factor is the adoption of tax compliance. However, there have not been many studies analyzing the relationship between attitude towards an e-tax system, adoption of an e-tax system, and tax compliance. This paper aims to investigate the mediating impact of adoption of an e-tax system in the association between attitude towards an e-tax system and tax compliance based on empirical evidence from Vietnamese enterprises. METHODOLOGY: On the basis of the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), the research model is proposed. Accordingly, hypotheses are developed and this study applies a quantitative analysis with a research sample of 435 Vietnamese enterprises. The questionnaire includes close-ended questions sent to managers or tax accounting officers at enterprises by three methods: directly interviewing, via e-mail, and via the General Department of Taxation. The collected data are then processed and analyzed by SPSS v.22 and AMOS. The study applies Cronbach’s Alpha as a tool for assessing the reliability or internal consistency of scales. Following is the exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Finally, regression analysis is used to evaluate the impact of the independent variables on the dependent variable and to estimate the research model. FINDINGS: There are significant direct effects of the two independent variables, attitude towards an e-tax system and adoption of an e-tax system, with the dependent variable tax compliance. Furthermore, the adoption of an e-tax system partially mediates the association between attitude towards an e-tax system and tax compliance. This mediating effect positively consolidates the impact of attitude towards an e-tax system and tax compliance. IMPLICATIONS: This paper mainly focuses on the tax compliance of Vietnamese enterprises that could be further studied with foreign enterprises that have been operating in Vietnam. Besides, the research is conducted in the context of Vietnam, thus, it is a reference for studies in other developing countries having a similar economy or tax administration. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study contributes to enhancing research associated with tax compliance, especially investigating the mediating impact of adoption of an e-tax system in the association between attitude towards an e-tax system and tax compliance of enterprises in the context of Vietnam. The findings of the study suggest some policy implications for improving tax compliance in Vietnam including (1) continuously improving the information technology infrastructure for both tax authorities and enterprises; (2) widely disseminating tax law and providing support services to enterprises; (3) upgrading the e-tax system to ensure the effective coordination between tax authorities, tax officials, enterprises, and other authorities in applying e-tax; (4) consolidating the supervision and assessment of the adoption of e-tax; (5) promoting information and education on the perception of complying with the tax law for taxpayers in particular and the entire population in general; (6) developing a tax administration strategy based on tax compliance.

Keywords: e-tax system adoption, attitude towards an e-tax system, e-tax, enterprises, tax compliance, Theory of Reasoned Action, TRA.

INTRODUCTION

Tax is one of the main sources of the state budget revenue and is also an important tool for the government to regulate the macro economy, promote investment, curb inflation, protect domestic production, and redistribute wealth and income in the society. According to the state regulations, tax is a payment that is a compulsory obligation for subjects including organizations, households, business households, and individuals in order to ensure the state budget revenue.

The tax system in Vietnam, as well as in other countries in the world, is considered an important element in the governance of the economic and financial legal system. In the process of renovating and building a socialist-oriented market economy, the role of the tax legal system has become more and more clear, having crucial impacts on the process of economic restructuring, improving the business environment, improving national competitiveness, supporting business development, and ensuring financial resources for the effective operation of the state and society.

In regard to taxation, most countries all over the world have followed the trend of improving the two-way relationship between tax authorities and taxpayers from a “head-to-head” relationship to a “companion” relationship. To specify, the traditional tax collection mechanism that was implemented by the tax authorities to calculate and notify the taxpayers to pay their taxes has been replaced by a self-calculation, self-filing, and self-paying tax collection mechanism, in which taxpayers are responsible for their tax declaration and payment. By integrating with that trend, the tax administration in Vietnam has implemented a bunch of measures to promote administrative procedure reform with a taxpayer-centered orientation. In recent years, the General Department of Taxation has increasingly applied information technology in tax administration reform through implementing electronic filing, electronic invoicing, and electronic refunding. Up to now, the electronic tax system has been adopted in 63/63 provinces and cities and 100% of tax departments. The number of enterprises using the electronic tax system has reached 99.93%. Moreover, all the tax departments have implemented electronic tax payment services by associating with more than 50 commercial banks (VCCI, 2019). By the end of 2018, there were 685,578 enterprises registered to use the electronic tax payment service, which reached a rate of more than 98%. The number of enterprises completing service registration with a bank is 672,609, accounting for more than 96% of the total number of operating businesses. The amount paid to the state budget reached over 557.697 billion dongs, equivalently 2,940,678 transactions of electronic tax payment (VCCI, 2019). In parallel, the General Department of Taxation has also implemented electronic tax refund applications in 63 provinces and cities; constructed and implemented a pilot electronic invoice system, and provided online public services. In 2019, the General Department of Taxation continued to review and amend supplement institutions and policies to simplify administrative procedures (VCCI, 2019).

The electronic tax services have brought significant benefits to enterprises and are a modern administrative tool for tax authorities. According to the report “Assessment of tax administrative procedure reform – the level of enterprises’ satisfaction in 2019” (VCCI, 2019) on electronic tax services, 97% of enterprises indicate that the level of implementation of electronic tax procedure, electronic tax registration and electronic tax payment are “easy” and “relatively easy.” Most taxpayers agree that electronic tax payment saves their time and tax payment procedures are easy to follow. In addition, there are still some difficulties related to the adoption of e-tax including data transmission congestion at the reporting period (47%), the cost of using digital signatures (15%), and regulations from commercial banks (7%) (VCCI, 2019).

However, the problem is whether the tax system, based on the application of technology, is as effective as expected or is creating loopholes for tax avoidances, tax evasion, and tax non-compliance, resulting in the loss of state budget revenue. The period 2016-2019 witnessed a significant increase in newly established enterprises, specifically, there were 110,100 new enterprises in 2016, 126,859 new enterprises in 2017, 131,275 new enterprises in 2018, and 138,139 new enterprises in 2019 (General Statistics Office, 2020). Whilst this is a positive signal for the economy, it is also a challenge for tax authorities to effectively manage tax collection with not only enterprises in particular but also taxpayers in general, in which taxpayers’ compliance is always considered the most important factor for tax authorities.

According to VCCI (2019), the rate of enterprises sanctioned for administrative violations after-tax inspection and examination across the country is 70%. This proves that the level of enterprises’ compliance is not really high, and it is necessary to overcome this situation. Meanwhile, reports of the General Department of Tax in the period 2016-2020 have shown that, in terms of attitude towards an e-tax system, a number of taxpayers have not complied with tax law and tax regulation, even trying to evade and avoid tax. This consequence is that the tax debt was still at a high level in comparison to the total state budget and the majority belongs to irrecoverable tax debts and fines. In terms of adoption of an e-tax system, it has been reported that the coordination, connection, and exchange of information among ministries, especially tax authorities among different regions in Vietnam was limited due to the unsynchronized infrastructure (General Department of Tax, 2016-2020). This practical evidence implies that the attitude towards an e-tax system of taxpayers and the adoption of an e-tax system might influence taxpayers’ level of compliance. From the theoretical perspective, Night and Bananuka (2018) conducted research to examine the mediating effect of adoption of electronic tax system in the relationship between attitude towards electronic tax system and tax compliance using evidence from small business enterprises (SBEs) in Uganda – a developing African economy. The above-mentioned reasons inspired the authors to investigate the topic related to the relationship among attitude towards an e-tax system, adoption of an e-tax system, and tax compliance in the context of Vietnam based on empirical evidence from Vietnamese enterprises. This paper raises three research questions (RQ):

RQ1) How does attitude towards an e-tax system impact tax compliance

of Vietnamese enterprises?

RQ2) How does adoption of an e-tax system impact tax compliance of

Vietnamese enterprises?

RQ3) Does adoption of an e-tax system mediate the relationship between

attitude towards an e-tax system and tax compliance of Vietnamese

enterprises?

To answer these questions, this research adopts the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) as the basis to develop the conceptual framework and hypotheses. It is followed by a quantitative analysis with a research sample of 435 Vietnamese enterprises. The collected data are then processed and analyzed by SPSS v.22 and AMOS. The study applies Cronbach’s Alpha as a tool for evaluating the reliability or internal consistency of scales. Following is the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to explore the underlying structure of a set of observed variables and consider convergence and differentiation of group variables, thereby, removing meaningless observation variables to improve research results. Finally, regression analysis is used to evaluate the impact of the independent variables on the dependent variable and to estimate the research model. On the basis of research results, the study proposes recommendations on the adoption of electronic tax to improve tax compliance of enterprises.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. The next section is a literature review where previous studies are summarized and discussed to arrive at the hypotheses. The following section is a methodology where the research design is clarified in detail and the results are shown. After the discussion of the results are the conclusion and implications.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Tax compliance

Tax compliance is defined as “the willingness of the taxpayers to act in accordance with both the ‘spirit’ and the ‘letter’ of the tax law and administration without the application of enforcement activity” (James & Alley, 2002). According to Marti (2010), tax compliance is fulfilling all the tax obligations as stated by the law willingly and fully. Singh (2003) also defines tax compliance as an act of lodging the income tax return form, stating all the taxable income truthfully, and paying all the tax obligations. There are a lot of international and national scholars who have conducted research about tax compliance. One of the pioneers in studying tax evasion and tax compliance are Allingham and Sandmo (1972), and Srinivasan (1973). The theory of tax evasion, applied and developed by these scholars, is seen as the very first study about tax evasion using the quantitative method. Allingham and Sandmo (1972) argue that taxpayers are always trying to find a way to maximize the benefit of their taxable income and this is influenced by the cost of compliance and benefit of tax evasion. According to the Allingham and Sandmo’s (1972) theory, the compliance decision depends on four main factors: the taxpayer’s real income, tax rate, audit probability, and punishment. A series of empirical studies have followed the theory, these studies all support and reinforce the conclusion that the punishment and the possibility of being audited will result in reducing tax non-compliance (Pate & Hamilton, 1992; Jackson & Jaouen, 1989; Dubin, 2007; Alm et al., 1992b; Baldry, 1986; Webley, 1991).

Tax compliance has been classified by many scholars with different approaches. According to Brown and Mazur (2003), tax compliance is divided into declaration compliance (proportion of taxpayers filing tax returns), payment compliance (paying taxes on time as prescribed), and reporting compliance (reporting honestly about income, expenses, or tax liability/responsibility). According to the OECD, there are two types of tax compliance: administrative compliance (compliance with the provisions of tax laws) and technical compliance (correct and sufficient tax declaration and payment in accordance with regulations), while Kirchler et al. (2008) indicate that tax compliance includes voluntary compliance and mandatory compliance.

Tax compliance has been approached from different perspectives. The main concern of most governments is that individuals and organizations fulfill tax obligations as well as execute tax regulations regardless of tax incentives. Even so, tax compliance could be the result of different motivations. It is possible to divide the factors affecting tax compliance into two groups: a group of economic factors and a group of social factors. From an economic point of view, theories consider taxpayers as rational people who have concerns about the costs and benefits of tax compliance as well as possible outcomes (Hasseldine, 1993).

Economic factors include tax rates, the possibility of a tax examination, penalties, and tax compliance costs. Tax rates are one of the most important bases, or the “soul” of a tax, as they directly determine the amount of tax payment. According to Schneider and Klinglmair (2004), Jackson et al. (1988), Mason and Calvin (1984), there is a relationship between tax evasion and marginal tax rates, in particular, tax rates have a positive effect on money holdings and tax evasion increases with the tax rate. In other words, the higher the tax rate, the more likely a taxpayer is to evade taxes (Schneider & Klinglmair, 2004; Jackson et al., 1988 Mason & Calvin, 1984). Similarly, the possibility of tax examination as a factor that strongly impacts taxpayers’ tax compliance has been demonstrated in many studies such as Alm et al. (1992b), Andreoni et al. (1998), Dubin et al. (1990), Jackson and Milliron (1986a). Some other studies also reinforce that audits have a positive effect on reducing tax fraud (Jackson & Jaouen, 1989). In terms of penalties, Swistak (2016), Grasmick and Scott (1982), Friedland (1982) prove that tax penalties are one of the tools that can be used to effectively prevent tax evasion. According to Swistak (2016), the higher the fine level, the more it contributes to limiting tax evasion as taxpayers tend to balance the benefits of tax evasion and the corresponding penalty for that act. Both high and low penalties have a corresponding effect on the level of tax compliance. The last economic factor is compliance costs which directly impact taxpayers’ compliance.

In contrast, the social factors include ethical standards, tax ethics, reputation and perceived fairness. Research by Torgler (2003a); Torgler and Murphy (2004), Torgler and Schneider (2009); Torgler (2005b) prove that tax ethics is “the existence of an intrinsic motivation to pay taxes” or considered as “a normative behavior guiding taxpayers in fulfilling their tax obligations.” In other words, tax ethics influence ethical principles or individual values for the payment of taxes (Torgler & Murphy, 2004). Besides, Andreoni et al. (1998) and Kim (2003) found that the reputation of enterprises in particular, and taxpayers in general, is achieved and enhanced through implementing corporate social responsibility, complying with the law, and paying taxes based on regulations. Therefore, taxpayers have fears of social stigma or damaged reputations if they were reported as tax fraudsters. This could result in a higher level of taxpayers’ compliance (Kim, 2003). According to Jackson and Milliron (1988), perceived fairness significantly influences tax compliance (but the impact dimension is still controversial and has not come to a consistent result among different studies).

In terms of psychology and behavior approach, a number of scholars (Elffers et al., 1987; Murphy, 2004; Tan, 1998; Torgler & Murphy, 2004) argue that the human factor is the decisive factor impacting the decision of tax compliance. Torgler is one of the remarkable authors studying tax compliance factors from the perspective of psychological and behavioral theory (Torgler, 2002; Cummings et al., 2009; Torgler, 2003a; Alm & Torgler, 2011; Torgler, 2005b; Torgler et al., 2008; Alm & Torgler, 2006; Frey & Torgler, 2007; Torgler, 2005a). These studies indicate that ethical standards have a positive effect on tax compliance behavior and tax compliance behavior of different cultures is not similar.

Electronic tax system in relation to attitude towards electronic tax system and adoption of electronic tax system

According to Che-Azmi and Kamarulzaman (2014), the e-tax system is based on the application of information and communication technology that most governments all over the world have been using to improve the provision of public services and public administrative procedures. The e-tax system is considered as the process of assessing, collecting, and managing the taxation process through an electronic system (Oloaye & Atilola, 2018). In similarity, Wasao (2014) defines the e-tax system as an online platform that allows taxpayers to access tax services and fulfill their tax obligations through the internet. Lee (2016) also indicates that the e-tax system contains powerful tools, which not only enable the integration of tax information provided by taxpayers, but also reduce tax compliance costs with efficient, transparent, and trustworthy services that ultimately enhance tax ethics and trust in tax administration. Nasir (2015) argues that the e-tax system, in particular for tax filing and paying, would benefit both taxpayers and tax authorities if it was well implemented and used by most taxpayers. Besides, other authors admit the positive impact of the e-tax system on tax compliance (Allahverdi et al., 2017; Barati & Bakhshayesh, 2015). Maisiba and Atambo (2016) also support the conclusion that the e-tax system improves tax compliance by facilitating faster access to tax services without the need for tax authorities. These authors focus on the e-tax system which was established by Kenya Revenue Authority to increase financial collection, administration, avail services to the taxpayers all the time from anywhere, reduce costs of compliance and improve tax compliance. The e-tax system enables for taxpayers an internet-based PIN registration, returns filing, and payment registration to allow for tax payments and status inquiries with real-time monitoring of accounts. Thus, in comparison to the old manual system, the electronic system is good and convenient by far. It reduces queues, workload, physical filing of large files, and cumbersome registration processes by both Kenya Revenue Authority officials and the government (Maisiba & Atambo, 2016).

There is a relationship existing between attitude towards an e-tax system and tax compliance that is proved by a number of researchers such as Simuyu and Jagongo (2019); Ondara et al. (2016); Maisiba and Atambo (2016); Al-Debei et al. (2015). Chan et al. (2000) find that the lower the level of taxpayers’ attitude towards an e-tax system, the lower the level they comply with tax laws. In confirmation, Al-Debei et al. (2015) also propose that taxpayers are willing to trust and adopt the e-tax system when they perceive or evaluate it to be secure. In contrast, taxpayers who evaluate the e-tax system as not easy to use do not adopt it, which affects tax compliance (Maisiba & Atambo, 2016). In addition, Ondara et al. (2016) emphasize a strong relationship between attitude towards an e-tax system and tax compliance. This is later proved by Simuyu and Jagongo (2019) study that when e-tax filing is easy, simple, and secure to file, it could improve taxpayers’ compliance.

Furthermore, the attitude towards an e-tax system also significantly influences the adoption of an e-tax system based on three aspects: perceived ease of use, the intensity of behavior, and the users’ satisfaction (Khaddafi et al., 2018). In other words, the easier the e-tax system is to use, the more motivated and more willing taxpayers are to apply it. This also partly results in the effective interactions between the e-tax system and taxpayers. It is remarkable that taxpayers with computer skills will find an e-tax system easier to adopt than those without (Zaidi et al., 2017). Indeed, these skills are found to influence the individual’s perception that a system is easy to use. The higher the computer skills an individual possesses, the more the individual will perceive that the technology is easy to use (Igbaria & Livari, 1995; Venkatesh & Davis, 2000; Wang et al, 2003). The study by Wang et al. (2003) also proves that computer self-efficacy affects the intention to adopt an electronic tax filing system by positively affecting perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. The research by Zaidi et al. (2017) confirms a positive and significant relationship between computer skills and the perceived ease of use of an e-tax system. That is, individuals with higher computer skills will perceive that using an e-tax system is easy.

The attitude towards the electronic tax system impacts the tax compliance behavior of the taxpayers. Thus, this study examines this relationship in the context of Vietnam to confirm whether there are any differences. Thereby, the first hypothesis is as follows:

H1: There is a positive relationship between attitude towards an e-tax

system and tax compliance.

The adoption of e-tax has become essential in developed countries and developing countries towards the trend of reforming tax administration through using information systems (Ondara et al., 2016). According to Lee (2016), the adoption of e-tax significantly contributes to both tax compliance and the transparency of business transactions and tax services. From the policy perspective, if the e-tax system is well-planned and well-executed, it could lead to a higher level of tax compliance. From the tax compliance process approach, Becker and Lacktorin-revier (2008) and Muturi and Kiarie (2015) argue that the implementation of e-filing and e-billing has significantly positive effects on the compliance of individual taxpayers. Similarly, Muturi & Kiarie (2015) emphasize that there is a positive relationship between e-registration and tax compliance of VAT. Besides, a study of the e-tax system in India by Motwani et al. (2015) indicates that although the adoption of e-tax in this country is not compulsory, e-filing of tax returns and e-payment still increases tax compliance of taxpayers. Findings by Muturi and Kiarie (2015) from Kenya also support the previous ones that there is a strong positive correlation between the adoption of the e-tax system through online tax registration and online tax return filing. In summary, the adoption of electronic tax system influence taxpayers’ compliance. Therefore, this paper proposed the second hypothesis to investigate how the adoption of an e-tax system impacts tax compliance of Vietnamese enterprises as follows:

H2: There is a positive relationship between adoption of an e-tax system

and tax compliance.

The relationship between attitude towards an e-tax system and adoption of the e-tax has also been proved by a number of studies including Barati et al. (2014); Asianzu and Maiga (2012); Ramlah (2010); Jahangir and Begum (2008). Findings by Barati et al. (2014) show that the level of adapting to the e-tax system depends on the attitudes of the taxpayer. These attitudes are demonstrated by perceived risk in relation to breaking privacy and disclosure of information. Similarly, Asianzu and Maiga (2012) argue that taxpayers in Uganda are not ready to use the e-tax system if they have negative attitudes towards it. In another study, the perception towards online tax filing in terms of ease and simplicity to file has a very close relationship with tax compliance (Kiring et al., 2017). With the same opinion, Ramlah (2010) discovered that the more the taxpayers believe in the e-tax system, the more committed they will become towards using the system. Jahangir and Begum (2008) also suggest that the belief in the usefulness of the e-tax system will attract more users towards the e-tax. Interestingly, Night and Bananuka (2018), in their research about the tax compliance of small business enterprises (SBEs) of an African developing economy, not only prove the relationship between attitude towards an e-tax system and adoption of the e-tax but also reveal that adoption of the e-tax is a partial mediator in the association between attitude towards the e-tax system and tax compliance. Based on the description above, the following hypothesis is summarized as follows:

H3: Adoption of an e-tax system mediates the relationship between

attitude towards an e-tax system and tax compliance.

This study utilizes the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975; Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980) as the theoretical basis to propose a conceptual framework to investigate the relationship between attitude towards an e-tax system, adoption of an e-tax system, and tax compliance, since the TRA aims to predict and understand the causes of behavior (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980). In TRA, behavioral intention is determined by attitudes and subjective norms (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975; Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980). Attitudes are sets of beliefs about a certain object or an act that may translate into the intention to carry out the act (Schwartz, 1992). Subjective norms are related to the normative belief that a person complies with the expectations of other people. Intention in an attitude-behavior relationship is influenced by the level of effort required to exercise the behavior (Bagozzi et al., 1990). In the light of the foregoing review of the literature integrating with the insights of TRA, the research model is designed including attitude towards an e-tax system, adoption of an e-tax system, and tax compliance (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Research model

METHODOLOGY

Sample and data collection

The research applies the convenient sampling method. The questionnaires are designed to gain information of Vietnamese enterprises about the attitude to an e-tax system, adoption of an e-tax system, and tax compliance. Besides, the information about enterprises’ characteristics such as size, the field of operation, location, etc. are also collected. The questionnaires, then, are mostly sent to managers or accountants of Vietnamese enterprises to collect data via e-mail due to the convenience for both interviewers and interviewees throughout Vietnam, especially with enterprises in the Middle and the South. In parallel, the questionnaires are also sent in person to enterprises with closer distances, most of them in Hanoi. As a result, there are 435 questionnaires completed from both cities and provinces in Vietnam but mostly from the North. The detailed sample is as follows:

Table 1. Field of operation and type of enterprise

Field of operation

Frequency

Percent (%)

Type of enterprise

Frequency

Percent (%)

Construction, transportation, warehouse

142

32.6

Limited Liability Company

176

40.5

Hotel, tourist

43

9.9

Joint stock company

154

35.4

Food production and processing

32

7.4

Private enterprise

47

10.8

Information, communication, telecommunications

21

4.8

State-owned enterprises

38

8.7

Science and technology

16

3.7

Foreign enterprises

2

0.5

Finance, banking, insurance

48

11.0

Joint venture enterprises

1

0.2

Pharmaceutical, medical, chemical cosmetics

23

5.3

Cooperatives, cooperative groups

5

1.1

Textiles, leather, and shoes

28

6.4

Others

12

2.8

Production and processing of agricultural, forestry, and aquatic products

20

4.6

 

Mining, processing and manufacturing industries

17

3.9

Educations

21

4.8

Real estate

23

5.3

Others

1

0.2

In terms of field of operation, the results indicate that enterprises belonging to the group of construction, transportation, warehouse fields are the majority with 32.6%, followed by enterprises in the group of finance, banking, insurance fields with 11%, and enterprises in the group of hotel, tourist fields with 9.9%. The minority is enterprises in some fields such as science and technology and the group of mining, processing, and manufacturing industries. Regarding the type of enterprise, most enterprises are Limited Liability Company and Joint-stock company, which account for approximately 75.9% while Joint venture enterprises only occupy 0.2%.

In terms of data collection, questionnaires for enterprises are sent to managers or tax accounting officers at enterprises by three methods: (1) directly investigating and interviewing with enterprises in Hanoi; (2) sending questionnaires via e-mail, letter to enterprises; (3) directly sending to the General Department of Taxation and tax departments to collect the feedback from enterprises outside Hanoi.

Scale and questionnaire development

The subject of the study is Vietnamese enterprises. The questionnaire includes the following four parts: (1) introduction of the research topic and purpose; (2) questions about industries, types, and sizes of enterprises, tax administrative procedures that have been/are applying electronic tax; (3) Questions about the impact of electronic tax on tax compliance of enterprises. The questionnaire is designed based on five rating levels created by Likert and referenced by many later researchers. Specifically, the five ratings include “strongly agree”, “agree”, “normal”, “disagree”, and “strongly disagree”. These rating levels are used for respondents to conveniently give feedback. The study uses Adoption of e-tax system scales by Night and Bananuka (2018). Adoption of an e-tax system is measured by eight observed variables on a scale of 1 to 5points ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The research uses Night and Bananuka’s (2018) eight indicators to measure Attitude towards an e-tax system on a scale of 1 to 5 points ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The research uses Tax compliance scales by Marti (2010). Tax compliance is measured by eleven observed variables on a scale of 1 to 5 points ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree.

To collect data for research, questionnaires are developed on the basis of indicators measuring concepts in the research model. Before designing the pilot questionnaire with a small sample, the study interviewed experts to test the concepts of variables and the connotation of indicators. Indicators are translated into Vietnamese through forward-reverse translation. Then, the questionnaire was tested with a small sample of respondents to ensure there was no misunderstanding about the content of the question and to adjust the final form of the questionnaire. Finally, the indicators used for the formal study are shown in Table 2.

Data analysis

The secondary and primary data, will be checked and cleaned before being processed by SPSS software for research purposes. The study applies Cronbach’s Alpha as a tool for assessing the reliability or internal consistency of scales. Following is the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to explore the underlying structure of a set of observed variables and consider convergence and differentiation of group variables, thereby, removing meaningless observation variables to improve research results. Finally, regression analysis is used to evaluate the impact of the independent variables on the dependent variable and to estimate the research model.

Table 2. Variable and scale

Variable

Scale

Source

Adoption of an e-tax system (AE)

AE _1

Our company uses the e-tax to ensure compliance with tax laws

Night and Bananuka (2018)

AE _2

Our company uses the e-tax system to avoid tax penalties

AE _3

Our company is currently using the e-tax system to fulfill tax obligations

AE _4

Our company registers for the tax identification number through the e-tax system

AE _5

Our company uses e-tax systems to file returns

AE _6

We use e-tax to pay taxes and fees

AE _7

Our company is equipped with computer skills to solve problems when using e-tax

AE _8

Our company has a computer system connected to the internet for the purpose of handling tax issues

Attitude towards an e-tax system (AT)

AT _1

The e-tax system helps us to handle tax problems more easily

Night and Bananuka (2018)

AT _2

The e-tax system helps us to improve our services delivery

AT _3

We find the e-tax system safe, secure and convenient to use

AT _4

We find that the e-tax system is very convenient and time saving

AT _5

We find e-tax returns are difficult to file

AT _6

We have positive feelings for the e-tax system

AT _7

We find that it better to use the e-tax system than the manual tax system

AT _8

The e-tax system is extremely essential and it supports the operation of our business

Tax compliance (TC)

TC _1

Our company state all taxes when declaring returns

Marti (2010)

TC _2

Our company declares all income to the tax authorities for tax assessment

TC _3

Our company pays taxes first before any other fees

TC _4

Our company always pays taxes on time

TC _5

We always file returns on time

TC _6

Upon filing returns, we register payment and proceed to pay

TC _7

After filing returns, we proceed to pay tax on the due date

TC _8

Our company always submits returns on the e-tax system and at the same time submit (hard copies) to the tax authorities

TC _9

Our company pays the taxes assessed by the tax authorities

TC _10

When our accounts are not audited on the due date of filing returns, we apply for extension of due date. Once the due date is granted, we file within the granted period

TC _11

Our company has been exempted from paying withholding tax

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Reliability analysis of Cronbach’s Alpha

The results of analyzing the reliability of Cronbach’s Alpha of the scales for the first time after eliminating the observed variables AT5, TC8 and TC11 the Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of the respective scales will increase. Table 3 is Cronbach’s Alpha reliability analysis results of the final scales. The total variable correlation coefficients of the observed variables in the scale are greater than 0.4 , and there is no case of removing any observed variables that can make Cronbach’s Alpha of this scale increase.

Table 3. Results of Cronbach’s Alpha of the final scales

Scale Mean if

Item Deleted

Scale Variance if

Item Deleted

Corrected Item-

Total Correlation

Cronbach’s Alpha if Item Deleted

Attitude towards an e-tax system (AT): Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.941

AT1

23.671

20.687

.832

.930

AT2

23.814

20.756

.769

.935

AT3

23.706

20.683

.811

.932

AT4

23.589

20.690

.835

.929

AT6

23.694

21.259

.779

.934

AT7

23.566

20.753

.776

.935

AT8

23.575

20.443

.840

.929

Adoption of an e-tax system (AE): Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.950

AE1

24.193

24.479

.846

.941

AE2

24.133

24.429

.873

.938

AE3

24.179

24.585

.866

.939

AE4

24.326

24.995

.799

.945

AE5

24.391

25.621

.757

.948

AE6

24.237

25.029

.811

.944

AE7

24.182

24.794

.855

.940

Tax compliance (TC): Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.934

TC1

31.239

32.717

.727

.928

TC2

31.234

32.304

.811

.923

TC3

31.269

32.635

.749

.927

TC4

31.191

32.777

.778

.925

TC5

31.163

32.188

.809

.923

TC6

31.285

32.877

.723

.928

TC7

31.230

32.270

.805

.923

TC9

31.276

32.196

.726

.928

TC10

31.345

32.623

.667

.932

Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)

The initial research model includes three factors and 26 observed variables. After testing the scales with Cronbach’s Alpha, the observed variables AT5, TC8 and TC11 were removed and 23 observed variables were included in the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with oblique rotation using KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) and Bartlett test method (Bartlett’s Test) to measure sample compatibility (Table 4).

When analyzing the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) for the impact factors group, the results showed that the coefficient of KMO test, Bartlett test, average variance extracted were satisfactory with KMO = 0.964, so factor analysis is completely appropriate; Sig. (Bartlett’s Test) = 0.000 <0.05, proving that the observed variables are correlated in the whole.

Table 4.KMO and Bartlett’s Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy.

.964

Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square

9702.466

df

300

Sig.

.000

Table 5 presents the results of the pattern matrix of the factor loadings by applying an extraction method of Principal axis factoring and a rotation method of Promax. The pattern matrix shows that the observed variables converge on three main components (three factors): the first factor, which consists of 11 observed variables (from TC1 to TC11) represents the scale of Tax compliance; The second factor which contains seven observed variables (AT1, AT3 to AT8) represents the scale of Attitudes towards electronic tax; The third factor which includes seven observed variables (from AE1 to AE7) represents the scale of Electronic Tax System. Moreover, the factor loadings of the observed variables are all higher than 0.5 that ensure the actual significance level (Hair et al., 2010). The convergence of observed variables on factors is also consistent with the theory. It implies that the observed variables in conceptual scales are strongly correlated with each other.

Table 5. Pattern matrixa

Variables

Factor

1

2

3

TC9

.834

   

TC7

.790

   

TC5

.779

   

TC6

.716

   

TC10

.696

   

TC4

.690

   

TC2

.687

   

TC8

.647

   

TC3

.616

   

TC11

.562

   

TC1

.545

   

AT1

 

.831

 

AT3

 

.800

 

AT4

 

.781

 

AT6

 

.766

 

AT2

 

.765

 

AT8

 

.763

 

AT7

 

.657

 

AE6

   

.832

AE2

   

.804

AE7

   

.774

AE3

   

.772

AE1

   

.743

AE4

   

.733

AE5

   

.703

Note: Extraction Method: Principal Axis Factoring; Rotation Method: Promax with Kaiser Normalization; a. Rotation converged in 5 iterations.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)

To confirm the validity of scales before analyzing the structural model, the research applies the CFA method to evaluate the validity of scales including Convergent Validity, Discriminant Validity, Reliability (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)

Table 6 reveals results of the Composite Reliability (CR), Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Maximum Shared Variance (MSV), Average Shared Variance (ASV), and the correlations between observed variables. According to Chin (1998) and Hair et al. (2010), the CR should be higher than 0.6 to ensure the reliability of scales. The results show that the CR of all scales is higher than 0.7, so it is ideal. Besides, the AVE should be higher than 0.5 and the ASV should be lower than the AVE in order to ensure the convergent and discriminant validity of scales (Hair et al., 2010). Meanwhile, the result of AVE is higher than 0.5, so the convergent validity is good. Also, it is proved that all concepts in the research model are satisfactory in terms of value (unidirectionality, convergent validity, and discriminant validity) and reliability.

Table 6. Results of Composite Reliability (CR) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE)

 

CR

AVE

MSV

ASV

AT

AE

TC

ETA

AT

0.942

0.698

0.719

0.629

0.836

 

 

 

AE

0.943

0.623

0.607

0.542

0.779

0.789

 

 

TC

0.934

0.565

0.564

0.560

0.749

0.744

0.752

 

ETA

0.950

0.731

0.719

0.583

0.848

0.683

0.751

0.855

The results of testing the relationships in the research model

The results of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) indicate that Chi-square = 961.934 (P=0.000); Chi-square/df = 3.537 < 5; RMSEA=0.076 < 0.08; TLI = 0.921 and CFI = 0.928 (both TLI and CFI are higher than 0.9), only GFI = 0.84 < 0.9 but still acceptable. So, the results are consistent with the actual data (Figure 3).

As mentioned above, the Composite Reliability (CR) should be higher than 0.6 to ensure the reliability of scales (Chin, 1998; Hair et al., 2010). The results of Table 7 show that the CR of all scales is higher than 0.7, so it is ideal.

Table 7. Estimated results of research model

     

Estimate

S.E.

C.R.

P-value

AE

<---

AT

.874

.049

18.001

***

TC

<---

AT

.373

.070

5.317

***

TC

<---

AE

.378

.068

5.527

***

Note: *** indicates p <0.001; SE: Standard error.

The result of a structural path calculation indicates that the Attitude towards an e-tax system (AT) has a direct and positive relationship to the Adoption of an e-tax system (AE) that can be observed from the Beta value (β = 0.874) with a significant value (P-value <0,001).

Figure 3. Results of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)

 So, hypothesis H3 is accepted. The result of a structural path calculation indicates that the Attitude towards an e-tax system (AT) has a direct and positive relationship to the Tax compliance (TC) that can be observed from the Beta value (β = 0.373) with a significant value (P-value <0.001). So, hypothesis H1 is accepted. The result of a structural path calculation indicates that the Adoption of an e-tax system (AE) has a direct and positive relationship to the Tax compliance (TC) that can be observed from the Beta value (β = 0.378) with a significant value (P-value <0,001). So, hypothesis H2 is accepted. The results also reveal that the adoption of an e-tax system partially mediates the association between attitude towards an e-tax system and tax compliance.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The research results indicate that there are significant direct effects of the two independent variables, attitude towards an e-tax system and adoption of an e-tax system, with the dependent variable tax compliance.

In particular, the attitude towards an e-tax system has a direct and positive relationship to tax compliance and contributes to 37.3% to the change of tax compliance. In other words, 1 unit change in the attitude towards an e-tax system is, on average, a 0.373 unit change in tax compliance. Based on the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), an explanation could be that when taxpayers find the e-tax system safe, secure, convenient, and time-saving, they will have positive feelings for the e-tax system. It then leads to the action of using the e-tax system, which results in improvements of tax compliance level. This result is consistent with some other findings such as Ondara et al. (2016) who found that there is a strong relationship between attitude towards electronic tax system and tax compliance; and Kiring et al. (2017) who concluded that there is a strong relationship between the perception towards online tax filing in terms of ease and simplicity to file and tax compliance.

Similarly, the adoption of an e-tax system has a direct and positive relationship to tax compliance and explains 37.8% of the change of tax compliance. Put it another way, 1 unit change in the adoption of an e-tax system is, on average, a 0.378 unit change in tax compliance. From the theoretical perspective, this finding is supported by the theory of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which argues that the perception of using information technology is crucial to the adoption. The adoption of information technology will probably enhance tax compliance. From the empirical perspective, this finding agrees with Muturi and Kiarie (2015) who indicated that there is a strong positive correlation between the adoption of an e-tax system through online tax registration, online tax return filing, online tax remittance, and tax compliance.

Furthermore, the paper also reveals that the adoption of an e-tax system partially mediates the association between attitude towards an e-tax system and tax compliance. This mediating effect positively consolidates the impact of attitude towards an e-tax system and tax compliance, which is also consistent with some other findings such as Motwani et al. (2015), Muturi and Kiarie (2015), and Night and Bananuka (2018). Especially, Night and Bananuka (2018) prove that the relationship between attitude and tax compliance is partially mediated by the adoption of an e-tax system through quantitative results.

The findings of the study suggest some policy implications for improving tax compliance in Vietnam as following:

Firstly, it is important to improve continuously the information technology infrastructure for both tax authorities and enterprises. For tax authorities, it is necessary to establish information security and safety systems through (1) building information security management software (with functions of detecting information leaks and information disaster incidents information; preventing attacks and denying service); (2) developing a centralized information management system that limits access and operation for each user; (3) building and operating an Information Security Center at the General Department of Taxation. For taxpayers in general and enterprises in particular, The General Department of Taxation should have solutions to more actively support the operation of e-tax services such as using e-invoices, e-tax refunds, and e-tax inspection procedures for enterprises. In parallel, the Government should have policies to invest in developing an internet infrastructure, upgrading the public information technology infrastructure, and providing robust internet coverage in remote and isolated areas to ensure the synchronization in the use of e-tax in the whole country.

Secondly, widely disseminating tax law and providing support services to enterprises by (1) publicizing tax administrative procedures at all levels of tax authorities on the mass media and the official website for enterprises to get information and supervise tax officials; (2) improving the one-stop service department to support enterprises in implementing tax administrative procedures, in particular focusing on providing electronic support services; (3) providing lookup and exchanging information services about enterprises’ performance of tax obligations to encourage the awareness of self-compliance with the tax law.

Thirdly, the e-tax system should be upgraded to ensure the effective coordination between tax authorities, tax officials, enterprises, and other authorities in applying e-tax through an overall program that includes an e-tax application that is simple, clear, transparent, easy to adopt for taxpayers and a tax administrative application that is synchronous, stable, transparent, fair and appropriate. Moreover, tax procedures should be reformed as well as tax policies and timely handling if there are any problems or shortcomings. A modern and effective, tax authority, decentralization system should be established to ensure that tax authorities are capable of tax administration in both domestic and international scope.

Fourthly, the supervision and assessment of the adoption of e-tax should be consolidated. In terms of the subject supervising, the General Department of Taxation should define the responsibilities of tax authorities at all levels in e-tax supervision. In addition, the tax authorities could coordinate with commercial banks, tax agents, accounting, and auditing agents in monitoring e-tax implementation. In terms of periodic assessment, it should be implemented quarterly and annually. E-tax monitoring and evaluation tools also need to be modernized through electronic diaries alongside traditional tax reporting and documentation. Finally, focusing and strongly supporting professional training as well as professional working style for tax officials who are responsible for supervising and assessing the adoption of e-tax.

Fifthly, information and education on the perception of complying with the tax law should be promoted for taxpayers in particular and the entire population in general. Tax authorities could take advantage of information technology and consider it as an effective solution to improve media efficiency. For example, sending messages about tax policy, tax law, or tax obligation information to stakeholders via email, social media (such as zalo), or sending SMS messages to individuals. In addition, the contents of tax laws and tax obligations should be accessible, with training programs at all levels, to form tax awareness that would lead to tax compliance behavior in the future.

Finally, a tax administration strategy based on tax compliance should be developed. Tax authorities manage enterprises’ tax compliance by completing a set of criteria for assessing tax compliance and improving methods to assess tax compliance. The set of tax compliance, assessment criteria should be based on three compliance requirements such as declarative compliance, payment compliance, and reporting compliance, and mainly focusing on the assessment criteria of reporting compliance because tax reporting is the easiest activity to cheat.

Acknowledgment

This research is funded by National Economics University, Hanoi, Vietnam.

References

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Al-Debei, M.M., Akroush, M.N., & Ashouri, M.I. (2015). Consumer attitudes towards online shopping: The effects of trust, perceived benefits, and perceived web quality. Internet Research, 5, 707-733. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0146

Allahverdi, M., Alagoz, A., & Ortakarpuz, M. (2017). The effect of e-taxation system on tax revenues and cost: Turkey case. European Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 100-150.

Allingham, M.G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economy, 38(2), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2

Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2006). Culture differences and tax morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 224-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.09.002

Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2011). Do ethics matter? Tax compliance and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 635-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0761-9

Alm, J., Jackson, B.R., & Michael, M. (1992b). Estimating the determinants of taxpayer compliance with experimental data. National Tax Journal, 45(1), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41788949

Andreoni, J., Brian, E., & Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(2), 818-860. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8282-7_12

Asianzu, E., & Maiga, G. (2012). A consumer based model for adoption of E-Tax services in Uganda. In IST-Africa 2012 Conference Proceedings. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-consumer-based-model-for-adoption-of-E-Tax-in-Asianzu-Maiga/e44dc80f5ef4432a34935d454ce1ed329d77d024

Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Baumgartner, J. (1990). The level of effort required for behavior as a moderator of the attitude–behavior relation. European Journal of Social Psychology, (20), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420200105

Baldry, J.C. (1986). Tax evasion is not a gamble: A report on two experiments. Journal Economics Letters, 22(4), 333-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(86)90092-3

Barati, A., & Bakhshayesh, S. (2015). Electronic tax system and the facing challenges. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 5(S1), 480-497.

Barati, A., Moradi, P., Ahmadi, B., & Azizpour, P. (2014). A study of the models for adoption of e-tax returns from the perspective of taxpayers. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4(S1), 1923-1939.

Becker, D., & Lacktorin-revier, S. (2008). The impact of electronic tax return filing on tax compliance. In MWAIS 2008 Proceedings. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1025&context=mwais2008

Brown, R.E., & Mazur, M.J. (2003). IRS’s comprehensive approach to compliance measurement. National Tax Journal, 56(3), 689-700. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2003.3.15

Chan, C.W., Troutman, C.S., & O’Bryan, D. (2000). An expanded model of taxpayer compliance: Empirical evidence from the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 9(2), 83-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1061-9518(00)00027-6

Che-Azmi, A. A., & Kamarulzaman, Y. (2014). Adoption of tax e-filing: A conceptual paper. African Journal of Business Management, 4(5), 599-603. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM.9000045

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.). Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wynne-Chin/publication/311766005_The_Partial_Least_Squares_Approach_to_Structural_Equation_Modeling/links/0deec533e0f7c00f59000000/The-Partial-Least-Squares-Approach-to-Structural-Equation-Modeling.pdf

Cummings, R. G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., McKee, M., & Torgler, B. (2009). Tax morale affects tax compliance: Evidence from surveys and an artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70, 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2008.02.010

Dubin, J.A. (2007). Criminal investigation enforcement activities and taxpayer noncompliance. Journal Public Finance Review, 35(4), 500-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142106295757

Dubin, J.A., Graetz, M.J., & Louis, L.W. (1990). The effect of audit rates on the federal individual income tax, 1977-1986. National Tax Journal, 43(4), 395-409. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41788861

Elffers, H., Russell, H.W., & Dick, J.H. (1987). The consequences of different strategies for measuring tax evasion behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8(3), 311-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(87)90026-2

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading. Boston, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Frey, B., & S và Torgler, B. (2007). Tax morale and conditional cooperation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(1), 136-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2006.10.006

Friedland, N. (1982). A note on tax evasion as a function of the quality of information about the magnitude and credibility of threatened fines: Some preliminary research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12(1), 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1982.tb00848.x

General Department of Tax (2016-2020). Annual reports in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020. Ha Noi.

General Statistics Office (2020). Enterprises, cooperatives and individual non-agricultural economic establishments. Ha Noi.

Grasmick, H.G., & Wilbur, J.S. (1982). Tax evasion and mechanisms of social control: A comparison with grand and petty theft. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2(3), 213-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(82)90004-6

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Seventh Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

Hasseldine, J. (1993). International: How do revenue audits affect taxpayer compliance?. Journal Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation, 47, 424-435.

Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(95)00035-6

Jackson, B.R., & Jaouen, P.R. (1989). Influencing taxpayer compliance through sanction threat or appeals to conscience. Journal Advances in Taxation, 2, 131-147.

Jackson, B.R., & Milliron, V.C. (1986a). Tax compliance research: Findings, problems, and prospects. Journal of Accounting Literature, 5(1), 125-165.

Jackson, B.R., Milliron, V.C., & Daniel R.T. (1988). Tax practitioners and the government. Journal Tax Notes, 41(3), 333-341.

Jahangir, N., & Begum, N. (2008). The role of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, security and privacy, and customer attitude to engender customer adaptation in the context of electronic banking. African Journal of Business Management. 2(2), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM.9000634

James, S., & Alley, C. (2002). Tax compliance, self-assessment and tax administration. MPRA Paper, 2(2), 27-42. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26906/1/MPRA_paper_26906.pdf

Khaddafi, M., Aspan, H., Heikal, M., Wahyuddin, F., & Zatin, H. (2018). Effect of perception of facilities, intensity of conduct, and satisfaction of Tax Payers to Submission of Letter by E-Filing Notice on Tax Service. In Proceedings of MICoMS (pp. 583-587). https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-793-1-00001

Kim, Y. (2003). Income distribution and equilibrium multiplicity in a stigma-based model of tax evasion. Journal of Public Economics, 87(7), 1591-1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00219-5

Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004

Kiring, S.E., Jagongo, A., Kiio, J.M., Njuguna, I.M., Muguongo, G.K., Nganyi, M.S., Sei, M.J., KaraniGichimu, C., Macharia, I., Mwangi, M., & Qiao, Y. (2017). Impact of online tax filing on tax compliance among small and medium enterprises (MSE) in Kibwezi Sub-County in Kenya. International Journal of Current Research, 9(4), 45196-45206.

Lee, H.C. (2016). Can electronic tax invoicing improve tax compliance?: A case study of the Republic of Korea’s electronic tax invoicing for value-added tax. World Bank Group. Retrieved from http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/712881467994710005/pdf/WPS7592.pdf

Maisiba, J.G., & Atambo, W. (2016). Effects of electronic tax system on the revenue collection efficiency of Kenya Revenue Authority. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(4), 815-827.

Marti, O.L. (2010). Taxpayers’ attitudes and tax compliance behavior in Kenya. African Journal of Business and Management, 1(1), 112-122.

Mason, R., & Calvin, L.D. (1984). Public confidence and admitted tax evasion. National Tax Journal, 37(4), 489-496. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41791980

Motwani, B., Haryani, S., & Matharu, S. (2015). Profession as the determinant on the adoption of e-taxation. Review of Professional Management – A Journal of New Delhi Institute of Management, 13(2), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.20968/rpm%2F2015%2Fv13%2Fi2%2F88683

Murphy, K. (2004). The role of trust in nurturing compliance: A study of accused tax avoiders. Journal Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 187-209. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000022322.94776.ca

Muturi, H.M., & Kiarie, N. (2015). Effects of online tax system on tax compliance among small taxpayers in Meru county, Kenya. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(12), 280-297.

Nasir (2015). Implementing electronic tax fillings and payments in Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(2), 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9984-2_Case_studies_4

Night, S., & Bananuka, J. (2018). The mediating role of adoption of an electronic tax system in the relationship between attitude towards electronic tax system and tax compliance. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 25(49), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-07-2018-0066

Oloaye, C.O., & Atilola, O.O, (2018). Effect of e-tax payment on revenue generation in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, 4(2), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.20448/2002.42.56.65

Ondara, T.G., Kimani, M., & Kwasira, J. (2016). Influence of online tax filing on tax compliance among small and medium enterprises in Nakuru town, Kenya. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 18(10), 82-92.

Pate, A.M., & Edwin, E.H. (1992). Formal and informal deterrents to domestic violence: The Dade County spouse assault experiment. Journal American Sociological Review, 57(5), 691-697. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095922

Ramlah, H. (2010). An integrated model on online tax adoption in Malaysia. In European, Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228469696_An_Integrated_Model_on_Online_Tax_Adoption_in_Malaysia

Schneider, F., & Klinglmair, R. (2004). Shadow economies around the world: What do we know?. Working Paper Series 2004-03. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.10.002

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6

Simuyu, K.E., & Jagongo, A. (2019). Impact of online tax filing on tax compliance among small and medium enterprises in Kibwezi Sub-county in Kenya. International Journal of Current Research, 9(1), 45196-45206.

Singh, V. (2003). Tax Compliance and Ethical Decision-Making: A Malaysian Perspective. Petaling Jaya: Longman.

Srinivasan, T.N. (1973). Tax evasion: A model. Journal of Public Economics, 2(4), 339-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(73)90024-8

Swistak, A. (2016). Tax penalties in SME tax compliance. Journal Financial Theory and Practice, 40(1), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.3326/fintp.40.1.4

Tan, L.M (1998). Taxpayers’ perceptions of fairness of the tax system – A preliminary study. New Zealand Journal of Taxation Law and Policy, 4(2), 59-71.

Torgler, B. (2005b). Tax morale in Latin America. Journal Public Choice, 122(1-2), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-5790-4

Torgler, B., & Murphy, K. (2004). Tax morale in Australia: What shapes it and has it changed over time. Journal of Australian Taxation, 7, 298-335.

Torgler, B., & Schneider, F. (2009). The impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 228-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.08.004

Torgler, B. (2002). Speaking to theorists and searching for facts: Tax morale and tax compliance in experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(5), 657-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00185

Torgler, B. (2003a). Tax morale and tax compliance: A cross culture comparison. In Proceedings. Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association (pp. 63-74). Retrieved from https://booksc.org/book/58134881/794dfe

Torgler, B. (2005a). Tax morale in Latin America. Journal Public Choice, 122(1-2), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-5790-4

Torgler, B., Demir, I.C., Macintyre, A., & Schaffner, M. (2008). Causes and consequences of tax morale: An empirical investigation. Journal Economic Analysis and Policy, 38(2), 313-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(08)50023-3

VCCI (2019). Assessment of tax administrative procedure reform – Enterprises’s satisfaction in 2019. Ha Noi. Retrieved from https://img.vietnamfinance.vn/upload/news/hoanghung_btv/2019/11/20/bao-cao-danh-gia-cai-cach-thu-tuc-hanh-chinh-thue.pdf

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Wang, Y. S., Wang, Y. M., Lin, H. H., & Tang, T. I. (2003). Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: An empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230310500192

Wasao, D. (2014). The effect of online tax system on tax compliance among small taxpayers in east of Nairobi tax district, University of Nairobi, Kenya. Retrieved from http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/74865/Wasao_The%20effect%20of%20online%20tax%20system%20on%20tax%20compliance%20among%20small%20taxpayers.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y

Webley, P. (1991). Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(92)90059-G

Zaidi, S.K.R., Henderson, C.D., & Gupta, G. (2017). The moderating effect of culture on E-Filing taxes: Evidence from India. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 7(1), 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-05-2015-0038

Abstrakt

CEL: Przestrzeganie przepisów podatkowych jest przedmiotem troski wielu naukowców na całym świecie. Większość z nich wskazuje na czynniki wpływające na zgodność podatkową, a jednym z istotnych czynników jest przyjęcie zgodności podatkowej. Nie ma jednak wielu badań analizujących związek między podejściem do systemu e-podatków, przyjęciem systemu e-podatków a przestrzeganiem przepisów podatkowych. Niniejszy artykuł ma na celu zbadanie pośredniczącego wpływu przyjęcia systemu e-podatków na związek między postawą wobec systemu e-podatków a zgodnością z przepisami podatkowymi w oparciu o dowody empiryczne pochodzące od wietnamskich przedsiębiorstw. METODYKA: Na podstawie Teorii Rozsądnego Działania (TRA) zaproponowano model badawczy. W związku z tym rozwijane są hipotezy, zastosowano analizę ilościową na próbie badawczej 435 wietnamskich przedsiębiorstw. Kwestionariusz zawiera pytania zamknięte, które są przesyłane do menedżerów lub księgowych w przedsiębiorstwach poprzez: bezpośrednią rozmowę kwalifikacyjną, e-mailem oraz za pośrednictwem Generalnego Departamentu Podatków. Zebrane dane są następnie przetwarzane i analizowane przez SPSS v.22 i AMOS. W badaniu zastosowano Alfa Cronbacha jako narzędzie do oceny rzetelności lub spójności wewnętrznej skal. Zastosowano eksploracyjną analizę czynnikową (EFA). Wreszcie analiza regresji służy do oceny wpływu zmiennych niezależnych na zmienną zależną oraz do oszacowania modelu badawczego. WYNIKI: Istnieją znaczące bezpośrednie skutki dwóch zmiennych niezależnych, stosunku do systemu e-podatków i przyjęcia systemu e-podatków, ze zmienną zależną zgodności podatkowej. Ponadto przyjęcie systemu e-podatków częściowo pośredniczy w związku między podejściem do systemu e-podatków a przestrzeganiem przepisów podatkowych. Ten efekt mediacji pozytywnie utrwala wpływ podejścia do systemu e-podatków i przestrzegania przepisów podatkowych. IMPLIKACJE: Ten artykuł skupia się głównie na zgodności podatkowej wietnamskich przedsiębiorstw, które mogą być dalej badane z zagranicznymi przedsiębiorstwami działającymi w Wietnamie. Poza tym badania prowadzone są w kontekście Wietnamu, mogą stanowić odniesienie do badań w innych krajach rozwijających się o podobnej gospodarce lub administracji podatkowej. ORYGINALNOŚĆ/WARTOŚĆ: Niniejsze badanie przyczynia się do wzmocnienia badań związanych z przestrzeganiem przepisów podatkowych, w szczególności badaniem pośredniczącego wpływu przyjęcia systemu e-podatków na związek między podejściem do systemu e-podatków a przestrzeganiem przepisów podatkowych przez przedsiębiorstwa w kontekście Wietnamu. Wyniki badania sugerują pewne implikacje polityczne dla poprawy przestrzegania przepisów podatkowych w Wietnamie, w tym (1) ciągłe ulepszanie infrastruktury informatycznej zarówno dla organów podatkowych, jak i przedsiębiorstw; (2) szerokie upowszechnianie prawa podatkowego i świadczenie usług wsparcia dla przedsiębiorców; (3) unowocześnienie systemu e-podatków w celu zapewnienia skutecznej koordynacji między organami podatkowymi, urzędnikami podatkowymi, przedsiębiorstwami i innymi organami w zakresie stosowania e-podatków; (4) konsolidacja nadzoru i oceny przyjęcia e-podatku; (5) promowanie informacji i edukacji w zakresie postrzegania przestrzegania prawa podatkowego w szczególności wśród podatników i ogółu społeczeństwa; (6) opracowanie strategii administracji podatkowej opartej na zgodności podatkowej.

Słowa kluczowe: system e-podatków, stosunek do systemu e-podatków, e-podatek, przedsiębiorstwa, przestrzeganie przepisów podatkowych, Teoria Rozsądnego Działania, TRA.

Biographical notes

Ha Thi Hai Do (First author) is an Associate Professor – the Dean of the Faculty of Management Science at National Economics University, Vietnam. Her scientific interests relate to Management and Public policy. She is also a member of the Education and Research Council at National Economics University, Vietnam.

Yen Thi Hai Mac (Corresponding author), Ph.D. candidate, is also a lecturer at the Faculty of Management Science, National Economics University, Vietnam. She has a master’s degree in Business Management at the Swinburne University of Technology, Australia. Her research focuses on Management and Policy.

Hoa Thi Van Tran is a Professor – the Vice President of National Economics University, Vietnam. Her research interests include Economics and Management. She is also a member of the Central Council of Theoretical Studies, Vietnam.

Thuy Thi Le Nguyen, Ph.D., is a lecturer at the Faculty of Management Science, National Economics University, Vietnam. Her main areas of interest and expertise are Management and Policy.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Citation (APA Style)

Do, H.T.H., Mac, Y.T.H., Van Tran, H.T., & Nguyen, T.T.L. (2022). The impact of attitude towards an e-tax system on tax compliance of Vietnamese enterprises: Adoption of an e-tax system as a mediator. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 18(1), 35-64. https://doi.org/10.7341/20221812